1966 Apal Formula Vee single seater

Suggestions CC2 Vehicle Suggestions
, ,
21

When you purposely mess up everything

Just to make the specs fictional

1 Like
22

image
image1125×2166 142 KB

Also how did he manage to comment 4 times in a row

2 Likes
23

I can if I want to

1 Like
24

Even if u tried, you would be prevented from doing that

1 Like
25

you can comment more than 3 times in a row on your own topic
or if you’re a moderator

3 Likes
26

Oh ok

2 Likes
27

Oh wait it works

image
image1125×2167 98.5 KB

2 Likes
28

Not for me. Check my discussion because I am not gonna tolerate any more of this.

2 Likes
29

Aerodynamics with next to no downforce and an open top coupled with 60’s brakes, tirewidth and tire quality absolutely does not give this car the excuse of having a high handling stat, TURBOFONZI

4 Likes
30

You haven’t tolerated anything, you’ve gotten mad over the smallest things

4 Likes
31

I want the people to talk good about the cars

3 Likes
32

F R E E D O M O F S P E E C H :us:

2 Likes
33

Lol

2 Likes
34

What about a Caterham, it has low tire width yet it has 18 handling

Also, it weighs 500Kg with driver which gives it a low centre of gravity

And the handling of the car is similar to a rally SUV ffs

2 Likes
35

Can someone close this topic? It gets on my nerves.

2 Likes
36

Revive
I made this topic and gave it horrible stats

1 Like
37

Revive again
Controversial topic

1 Like
39

it would be funny if I could fix the specs, but I’m not gonna do that without permission

1 Like